Minnesota’s Green Bank Applauded by Senator Tou Xiong
Minnesota Senate DFL
SAINT PAUL, Minn. – On Monday, the Senate Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate Committee heard a presentation from the Minnesota Climate Innovation Finance Authority, the Green Bank.
Legislation passed in 2023 by Senator Tou Xiong (DFL-Maplewood) set up the Minnesota Green Bank to finance projects that:
The Green Bank is a lending authority—it does not provide grants. It loans money that is repaid. The loans are private-public partnerships with other funders in the capital stack. Usually, the Green Bank only accounts for 10-20% of the total loan.
Three projects have been financed in 2024, totaling $11 million in capital. These include:
Senator Xiong released the following statement:
“The first year of Minnesota’s Green Bank has been a great success,” said Sen. Xiong. “Green investment is a growing sector that Minnesota cannot miss out on. This is just the start of our state’s investment in a green future, climate resiliency, and economic prosperity for all. I am closely following the work of the Green Bank to ensure its success into the future.”
As a result of President Trump’s federal funding freeze, multiple federal funding sources that the Green Bank utilized are/were frozen. This has caused uncertainty for private investors.
“Haphazardly, the federal government has frozen funds that could provide jobs in our emerging green economic space,” said Sen. Xiong.“For example, freezing $25 million from the federal Coalition of Green Capital hinders the Green Bank’s capacity to fund worthy projects across Minnesota and spooks private investment. This uncertainty and chaos are not at all ideal for investment. If this continues, consumers will take the hit on energy prices, Minnesotans will lose out on jobs, and our climate will continue to suffer when we cannot move our green energy sector forward. I implore our congressional delegation to act swiftly and reverse these federal freezes and cuts.”
###
© Copyright 2025 Minnesota Senate DFL
FLASHBACK: Dem senator embroiled in conflict of interest row targeted SCOTUS in ethics crusade
Fox News senior congressional correspondent Chad Pergram provides details on the upcoming vote on the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., is in the spotlight over a new ethics complaint about votes that ultimately yielded millions for a green nonprofit that pays his wife’s consulting firm.
Before that, he led an aggressive campaign alleging ethical violations of conservative Supreme Court justices.
The Democratic senator took particular aim at conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas after several instances of undisclosed travel and trips were reported in 2023. “The Supreme Court justices are so deeply ensconced in a cocoon of special interest money that they can no longer be trusted to police themselves without proper process,” Whitehouse claimed at the time.
‘UTTER DISASTER’: LINDSEY GRAHAM CALLS FOR ZELENSKYY RESIGNATION AFTER WHITE HOUSE THROWDOWN
Before the latest ethics complaint against him was filed, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, center, led a campaign against Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, right, over what he asserted were ethical violations. (Reuters)
This history of acting as a judicial ethics watchdog for conservative justices has left some calling the latest ethics complaint against Whitehouse from the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) ironic.
“The irony here absolutely takes my breath away,” Thomas Jipping, senior legal fellow with the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, previously told Fox News Digital.
Whitehouse’s office provided a letter to Fox News Digital from the Senate Select Committee on Ethics last year informing another watchdog group, Judicial Watch, that the senator’s actions did not violate “federal laws, Senate rules, or other standards of conduct.”
The group had filed a similar ethics complaint to FACT.
“This is a repeat dark money performance, and the previous attempt by a dark money group to plant these same smears was roundly dismissed by Senate Ethics,” Whitehouse spokesperson Stephen DeLeo told Fox News Digital in a statement. “The billionaires and Supreme Court capture operatives behind FACT would like to try to stop Senator Whitehouse from shining a light on what they’ve done to deprive regular people of a fair shake before the Court. But false accusations from far-right special interests and billionaires will not impede the Senator’s pursuit of an accountable, ethical government that responds to Americans’ needs.”
SEE THE STAR-STUDDED LIST OF TRUMP ALLIES DESCENDING ON DC TO CHART FURTHER 100-DAY WINS
The gifts accepted by Thomas from GOP donor Harlan Crow came under severe scrutiny by Democrats, but experts are still at odds over whether they violated the law.
The post-Watergate-era 1978 Ethics in Government Act dictates that government officials, judges included, should report all gifts over a certain dollar amount that are “received from any source other than a relative.” There are exceptions for “food, lodging, or entertainment received as personal hospitality of an individual.”
Thomas did ultimately revise his disclosure to include trips from 2019 with Crowe.
FURIOUS DEMS ATTACK TRUMP, VANCE AFTER EXPLOSIVE OVAL OFFICE MEETING WITH ZELENSKYY: ‘SIDING WITH DICTATORS’
Following the report on his undisclosed trips, Thomas said he had been advised they did not need to be reported.
“Early in my tenure at the court, I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the court, was not reportable,” he said in a statement released by the Supreme Court at the time. “I have endeavored to follow that counsel throughout my tenure, and have always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.”
Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife and conservative activist Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation on Oct. 21, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Whitehouse asked that the Department of Justice (DOJ) open a criminal investigation into Thomas, which the U.S. Judicial Conference formally declined to refer to the DOJ in January.
Thomas was not the only conservative justice to face Whitehouse’s ire; he also targeted Justice Samuel Alito for alleged ethical misconduct.
Last year, reports emerged about an upside-down American flag at Alito’s home following the 2020 election and an “Appeal to Heaven” flag flying outside his vacation home in New Jersey. Critics quickly jumped on the opportunity to pressure the justice to recuse himself from crucial upcoming decisions regarding then-presidential candidate Donald Trump’s criminal cases.
Alito attributed the upside-down flag to his wife and neighborhood drama. The “Appeal to Heaven” flag is popular among conservatives and is notably featured outside many congressional offices in the U.S. Capitol.
GABBARD SAYS BIDEN ADMIN IGNORED ‘HIGHLY INAPPROPRIATE’ CHATS HAPPENING AT NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCIES
In an interview at the time, Whitehouse said the flag ordeal “demonstrates why the Supreme Court needs an enforceable code of conduct,” for which he has notably introduced a bill. However, many have pushed back on the idea that the legislature can or should regulate the court. Alito himself weighed in during an interview for the Wall Street Journal last year.
“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it. No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court—period,” he said.
Whitehouse again took him to task for the “improper” interview. “From the outside, it looks like the attorney recruited you to prop up his legal case against our investigation, using the interview to advance the argument he and several colleagues were making,” he claimed, referring to attorney David Rivkin, who interviewed Alito alongside Wall Street Journal editorial features editor James Taranto.
An upside-down American flag was displayed outside of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s home on Jan. 17, 2021, days after President Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol, The New York Times first reported. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)
Most recently, the senator attacked Alito over a phone call with Trump regarding a former clerk being considered for his administration. The phone call came as cases involving Trump’s administration were pending in court.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“This contact could potentially implicate provisions of the Supreme Court’s new code of conduct and of federal law… We humbly suggest that this incident provides yet another reason for the Judicial Conference and the Court to agree on some sort of neutral fact-finding when a justice’s conduct is questioned,” Whitehouse wrote in a January letter to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and the Judicial Conference.
“William Levi, one of my former law clerks, asked me to take a call from President-elect Trump regarding his qualifications to serve in a government position. I agreed to discuss this matter with President-elect Trump, and he called me yesterday afternoon,” Alito told Fox News’ Shannon Bream.
Julia Johnson is a politics writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business, leading coverage of the U.S. Senate. She was previously a politics reporter at the Washington Examiner.
Follow Julia’s reporting on X at @JuliaaJohnson_ and send tips to Julia.Johnson@fox.com.
Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more Fox News politics content.
By entering your email and clicking the Subscribe button, you agree to the Fox News Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content and promotional communications from Fox News. You understand that you can opt-out at any time.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper.
Sheldon Whitehouse’s history of acting as a judicial ethics watchdog for conservative justices has left some calling the latest ethics complaint ironic
Related Topics
Recommended
More from Politics
Fox News Politics
Democrat removed from House chamber for disrupting Trump address
Republicans chanted USA after Democrats booed during President Trump’s speech on Capitol Hill
Dems interrupt Trump and are drowned out by ‘USA’ chants
First lady Melania Trump enters House Chamber to standing ovation
President Donald Trump enters House Chamber for joint address to rousing ovation
Kid Rock tells Dems to ‘shut up, sit there and learn something’ at Trump address
Congressional address guests thank Trump ahead of highly-anticipated speech
This is Dems’ story and they’re sticking to it: Byron York
Vivek Ramaswamy: ‘It’s now or never for saving the country’
Jesse Watters: Democrats used to have a well-oiled machine for their ‘propaganda’
Democrats don’t have strategy on making Americans’ lives better, Rep. Byron Donalds says
Democrats have nothing to offer, GOP lawmaker says
Democrats are ‘still too cowardly’ to stand up for women, says Sen. Katie Britt
Democrats should avoid ‘shenanigans’ tonight, Martha MacCallum warns
Zelenskyy ‘bit the hand that was trying to feed him’: Sen. Markwayne Mullin
Kudlow on Trump tariffs: If there are temporary price adjustments, they won’t be lasting
Coming up on Wednesday, March 5 edition of ‘Special Report’
The president is driving the agenda, says former Trump 2024 campaign co-chair manager
Bret Baier explains the fallout of Trump tariffs on China, Mexico and Canada
Democratic senators launch social media blitz against Trump
Senate tees up filibuster vote on women’s sports bill
Trump declares ‘America is back’ in speech before Congress
Guests of first couple rally around Trump’s policies ahead of address to Congress: ‘Incredible stories’
Pete Buttigieg meets with Chuck Schumer as he considers Michigan Senate bid
Florida governor spotlights timely golf outing he and Casey DeSantis had with President Trump
U.S.
Politics
World
Opinion
Media
Entertainment
Sports
Lifestyle
Deals
FOX Business
Science & Tech
Games
Watch Live
About
Apps & Products
FLASHBACK: Dem senator embroiled in conflict of interest row targeted SCOTUS in ethics crusade
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., is in the spotlight over a new ethics complaint about votes that ultimately yielded millions for a green nonprofit that pays his wife’s consulting firm.
Before that, he led an aggressive campaign alleging ethical violations of conservative Supreme Court justices.
The Democratic senator took particular aim at conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas after several instances of undisclosed travel and trips were reported in 2023. “The Supreme Court justices are so deeply ensconced in a cocoon of special interest money that they can no longer be trusted to police themselves without proper process,” Whitehouse claimed at the time.
‘Utter Disaster’: Lindsey Graham Calls For Zelenskyy Resignation After White House Throwdown
This history of acting as a judicial ethics watchdog for conservative justices has left some calling the latest ethics complaint against Whitehouse from the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) ironic.
“The irony here absolutely takes my breath away,” Thomas Jipping, senior legal fellow with the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, previously told Fox News Digital.
Read On The Fox News App
Whitehouse’s office provided a letter to Fox News Digital from the Senate Select Committee on Ethics last year informing another watchdog group, Judicial Watch, that the senator’s actions did not violate “federal laws, Senate rules, or other standards of conduct.”
The group had filed a similar ethics complaint to FACT.
“This is a repeat dark money performance, and the previous attempt by a dark money group to plant these same smears was roundly dismissed by Senate Ethics,” Whitehouse spokesperson Stephen DeLeo told Fox News Digital in a statement. “The billionaires and Supreme Court capture operatives behind FACT would like to try to stop Senator Whitehouse from shining a light on what they’ve done to deprive regular people of a fair shake before the Court. But false accusations from far-right special interests and billionaires will not impede the Senator’s pursuit of an accountable, ethical government that responds to Americans’ needs.”
See The Star-studded List Of Trump Allies Descending On Dc To Chart Further 100-Day Wins
The gifts accepted by Thomas from GOP donor Harlan Crow came under severe scrutiny by Democrats, but experts are still at odds over whether they violated the law.
The post-Watergate-era 1978 Ethics in Government Act dictates that government officials, judges included, should report all gifts over a certain dollar amount that are “received from any source other than a relative.” There are exceptions for “food, lodging, or entertainment received as personal hospitality of an individual.”
Thomas did ultimately revise his disclosure to include trips from 2019 with Crowe.
Furious Dems Attack Trump, Vance After Explosive Oval Office Meeting With Zelenskyy: ‘Siding With Dictators’
Following the report on his undisclosed trips, Thomas said he had been advised they did not need to be reported.
“Early in my tenure at the court, I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the court, was not reportable,” he said in a statement released by the Supreme Court at the time. “I have endeavored to follow that counsel throughout my tenure, and have always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.”
Whitehouse asked that the Department of Justice (DOJ) open a criminal investigation into Thomas, which the U.S. Judicial Conference formally declined to refer to the DOJ in January.
Thomas was not the only conservative justice to face Whitehouse’s ire; he also targeted Justice Samuel Alito for alleged ethical misconduct.
Last year, reports emerged about an upside-down American flag at Alito’s home following the 2020 election and an “Appeal to Heaven” flag flying outside his vacation home in New Jersey. Critics quickly jumped on the opportunity to pressure the justice to recuse himself from crucial upcoming decisions regarding then-presidential candidate Donald Trump’s criminal cases.
Alito attributed the upside-down flag to his wife and neighborhood drama. The “Appeal to Heaven” flag is popular among conservatives and is notably featured outside many congressional offices in the U.S. Capitol.
Gabbard Says Biden Admin Ignored ‘Highly Inappropriate’ Chats Happening At National Security Agencies
In an interview at the time, Whitehouse said the flag ordeal “demonstrates why the Supreme Court needs an enforceable code of conduct,” for which he has notably introduced a bill. However, many have pushed back on the idea that the legislature can or should regulate the court. Alito himself weighed in during an interview for the Wall Street Journal last year.
“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it. No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court—period,” he said.
Whitehouse again took him to task for the “improper” interview. “From the outside, it looks like the attorney recruited you to prop up his legal case against our investigation, using the interview to advance the argument he and several colleagues were making,” he claimed, referring to attorney David Rivkin, who interviewed Alito alongside Wall Street Journal editorial features editor James Taranto.
Most recently, the senator attacked Alito over a phone call with Trump regarding a former clerk being considered for his administration. The phone call came as cases involving Trump’s administration were pending in court.
“This contact could potentially implicate provisions of the Supreme Court’s new code of conduct and of federal law… We humbly suggest that this incident provides yet another reason for the Judicial Conference and the Court to agree on some sort of neutral fact-finding when a justice’s conduct is questioned,” Whitehouse wrote in a January letter to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and the Judicial Conference.
“William Levi, one of my former law clerks, asked me to take a call from President-elect Trump regarding his qualifications to serve in a government position. I agreed to discuss this matter with President-elect Trump, and he called me yesterday afternoon,” Alito told Fox News’ Shannon Bream.
Original article source: FLASHBACK: Dem senator embroiled in conflict of interest row targeted SCOTUS in ethics crusade
